AOA Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
07 January, 2009, 06:12:02 am

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
AOA Forum is now live. Please register to make a post.
686 Posts in 103 Topics by 72 Members
Latest Member: nlnphrmcp
* Home Help Calendar Login Register
+  AOA Forum
|-+  General Category
| |-+  Research & Development
| | |-+  Assessment of diclofenac or spinal manipulative therapy, or both...
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Assessment of diclofenac or spinal manipulative therapy, or both...  (Read 326 times)
Osteotate
Justin Tate
Administrator
Full Member
******
Posts: 88


View Profile
Assessment of diclofenac or spinal manipulative therapy, or both...
« on: 23 July, 2008, 07:26:38 pm »

Assessment of diclofenac or spinal manipulative therapy, or both, in addition to recommended first-line treatment for acute low back pain: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate whether the addition of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or spinal manipulative therapy, or both, would result in faster recovery for patients with acute low back pain receiving recommended first-line care. METHODS: 240 patients with acute low back pain who had seen their general practitioner and had been given advice and paracetamol were randomly allocated to one of four groups in our community-based study: diclofenac 50 mg twice daily and placebo manipulative therapy (n=60); spinal manipulative therapy and placebo drug (n=60); diclofenac 50 mg twice daily and spinal manipulative therapy (n=60); or double placebo (n=60). The primary outcome was days to recovery from pain assessed by survival curves (log-rank test) in an intention-to-treat analysis. This trial was registered with the Australian Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN012605000036617. FINDINGS: Neither diclofenac nor spinal manipulative therapy appreciably reduced the number of days until recovery compared with placebo drug or placebo manipulative therapy (diclofenac hazard ratio 1.09, 95% CI 0.84-1.42, p=0.516; spinal manipulative therapy hazard ratio 1.01, 95% CI 0.77-1.31, p=0.955). 237 patients (99%) either recovered or were censored 12 weeks after randomisation. 22 patients had possible adverse reactions including gastrointestinal disturbances, dizziness, and heart palpitations. Half of these patients were in the active diclofenac group, the other half were taking placebo. One patient taking active diclofenac had a suspected hypersensitivity reaction and ceased treatment. INTERPRETATION: Patients with acute low back pain receiving recommended first-line care do not recover more quickly with the addition of diclofenac or spinal manipulative therapy.

dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61686-9
Logged
Osteotate
Justin Tate
Administrator
Full Member
******
Posts: 88


View Profile
Re: Assessment of diclofenac or spinal manipulative therapy, or both...
« Reply #1 on: 23 July, 2008, 07:28:15 pm »

Re the above article from the American Osteopathic Association:

Spinal Manipulation Study Emphasizes the Need for OMT Guidelines

http://www.jaoa.org/cgi/content/full/108/7/322?etoc#SEC3
Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP AOA Forum | Powered by SMF 1.0.8.
© 2001-2005, Lewis Media. All Rights Reserved.
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!